Oppression is the act of treating someone cruelly or unjustly that is prolonged. Those who fight oppression do so in two different ways, either through non-violent resistance or violent resistance. Non-violent resistance is enacted by using peaceful means in which people aren’t harmed and their oppressors are shamed into changing their ways, violent resistance is the opposite, using threats of pain or death, in most cases acting on those threats to resist their oppressors. Citizens resist in these two ways for more often than not agency, which is the ability to determine the outcome of one’s own life. In my opinion of these two forms of resistance I believe non-violence should be most often to gain agency.
People should use non – violence to gain agency because while it many years, black people were able to have the rules changed to make things more equal, through non- violence. This document is about the Jim crow laws that were enacted to keep the black population oppressed. he document is an online article created by the staff of the website History.com on 2009. The source can be seen as reliable since it provides evidence through the laws that are in place today and was in place. They also do not favor one side over another since they describe the actions of whites but also the impact of those actions on blacks. The change in laws was caused by non – violent marches in an attempt to gain agency. Despite the absolute brutality the black population didn’t throw not one punch and if they did then they would justify the white supremacist reasons for invoking interpersonal oppression and hinder the blacks ability to gain agency.
Also in another document, it talks about how a nonviolent approach is better than a violent one. The document itself is about MLK’s perspective on the effectiveness of violence and non-violence. The document is an excerpt of the speech ¨The Other America¨ written by Dr.Martin luther King on March 14, 1968. The document is trustworthy because it was written by a primary source who doesn’t show bias for either side and is a well known civil rights activist known worldwide.
Secondly, the document I chose supports my claim because the author of the document does not seek revenge on her aggressors attack. The document is about Malala Yousafzai choosing to remain peaceful despite the attack enacted by the Taliban. The document is an excerpt of a speech created by Malala Yousafzai on July 12, 2013. The information is trustworthy because it’s not very old, Malala is known for her kind and peace loving nature making it unlikely that she would lie.